What Would Life Look Like If There Were Only 100 People?
Written on
Understanding the Impact of a 100-Person World
Could introverted individuals truly find happiness in an existence limited to just 100 people?
According to a study featured in the journal Psychological Science, introverts, who prefer solitude, represent about 30% to 50% of the global population. This suggests that a significant portion of humanity favors living in isolation or in smaller groups.
So, if these introverted individuals were to inhabit a world consisting solely of 100 people, would they truly be content?
If we hypothetically reduced the Earth's population to 100 individuals, the demographic distribution might look something like this: 60 would reside in Asia, 15 in Africa, 11 in Europe, and 14 in the Americas.
Considering age, culture, religion, and language variations, organizing any collective study would be challenging. To streamline this scenario, let’s assume these 100 people share the same age, culture, language, and gender distribution—50 men and 50 women—allowing for the possibility of marriage.
Could these 100 individuals thrive in their new environment?
While the idea of such a small population may sound appealing, it would bring both benefits and drawbacks.
On the one hand, the world would likely become peaceful and serene, fulfilling the introverts' desires for isolation and tranquility. Additionally, they would essentially have access to all the Earth's resources. There would be no formal obligations, and anyone could access spaces like the White House or any palace.
However, we must be realistic; the advantages would not outweigh the challenges. With only 100 people, they would soon realize they need a variety of resources and services to survive. In essence, civilization as we know it would cease to exist.
Who would perform essential jobs?
Who would produce food, clothing, or even manage grocery stores?
Nature’s Revival in a Depopulated World
Now, let’s consider the environmental implications of a drastically reduced human population. Research by an environmental charity indicates that the human population's growth from 1970 to 2020 led to a 50% decline in wildlife. If we were to reverse this trend and reduce human numbers significantly, nature would flourish; urban areas could revert to forests, and wildlife would thrive.
Initially, we imagined these 100 individuals as a balanced mix of genders to facilitate reproduction. However, interpersonal dynamics would still pose challenges. Conflicts would inevitably arise, and the pressing question would be:
Who would mediate disputes and uphold order?
What would happen if two individuals wanted to marry the same person?
In such a limited group, each individual would have to undertake vital roles, such as healthcare providers and various essential jobs. Would they willingly accept these responsibilities?
And the complications don’t end there. Consider the introvert who wishes to live alone.
Doesn’t this individual enjoy TV, the internet, or books authored by others?
Wouldn’t they want to watch sports?
If the answer is yes, the next question arises:
Who would provide these services?
In a population of just 100, who would participate in sports or create literature?
Relying on recorded content raises further concerns:
Can we ensure a continuous electricity supply?
If not, life would rely solely on past experiences and information, leaving no room for growth or development.
In summary, if humanity were limited to just 100 individuals, their destiny would likely be extinction. This isn’t merely a theoretical exercise, but rather a conclusion supported by research from leading academic institutions. Without a functioning society to support one another, these 100 people would ultimately confront their mortality.
The sociologist Ibn Khaldun noted that humans are inherently social and cannot thrive without relationships and mutual support.
Anthropologist Professor Cameron Smith from Portland State University suggests that a minimum of 14,000 individuals is necessary to avoid extinction, even in a primitive society devoid of modern civilization. Additionally, this number assumes no exposure to catastrophic events such as earthquakes or epidemics.
So, what would be the fate of a mere 100 people?
In closing, despite the points raised, the lingering question remains:
Would introverts find happiness in a world populated by only 100 individuals?
I invite your thoughts in the comments section.
Exploring the Scenario of 100 People
The first video, "If the World Was Only 100 People," delves into the implications of a drastically reduced human population. It highlights the cultural, social, and environmental changes that might occur in such a scenario.
Understanding the Dynamics of 100 Individuals
The second video, "What If Only 100 People Existed on Earth?" discusses the challenges and complexities that would arise in a world limited to just 100 humans, emphasizing the interplay between social structures and survival.