The Impact of Dog Waste on Our Environment: Understanding the Risks
Written on
Chapter 1: The Environmental Risks of Dog Waste
Our beloved canine companions inevitably leave behind droppings, which are significant contributors to nutrient pollution. Dog feces are rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, and in urban areas, these nutrients often make their way into storm drains, streams, and ultimately coastal waters. The excessive introduction of these nutrients can lead to degraded water quality and cultural eutrophication, a process characterized by reduced oxygen levels in lakes and oceans.
Increased nutrient levels stimulate the rapid growth of algae. When these algae die, the bacteria that decompose them consume the dissolved oxygen in the water, leading to hypoxic conditions that can be fatal for fish and other aerobic aquatic organisms. Moreover, harmful cyanobacteria can produce hydrogen sulfide, rendering freshwater sources unsafe for consumption.
Nitrogen from dog waste can volatilize as ammonia (NH3) and seep into groundwater as ammonium (NH4). In contrast, phosphorus, present as phosphate (PO4), is less soluble and does not leach into groundwater as easily; it remains relatively stable in soil. However, erosion of soil particles and the prevalence of hard surfaces in urban settings facilitate the entry of phosphorus into waterways (Hobbie et al. 2017; Suprihatin et al. 2003).
Urban watersheds, influenced by dog feces and household fertilizers, contribute significantly to nutrient pollution and the resulting eutrophication of lakes and coastal areas (Duan et al. 2012; Dubrovsky et al. 2010; Driscoll et al. 2003). It is essential for all of us to be accountable for managing the nutrients that leave our properties.
The ongoing production of nitrogen and phosphorus has surpassed the planetary boundary known as 'Biochemical Flows.' This, along with the degradation of biodiversity within 'Biosphere Integrity,' represents a critical challenge as three more boundaries are at risk out of a total of nine (Campbell et al. 2017).
The Gulf of Mexico’s dead zone exemplifies the consequences of cultural eutrophication. During summer months, this dead zone can stretch from the mouth of the Mississippi River to the Texas border, covering around 500 kilometers. The spring runoff from the Mississippi carries high levels of nitrates and phosphates from agricultural activities, sewage, and urban runoff, including dog waste. This creates a freshwater layer on top of denser saltwater, inhibiting mixing and leading to excessive phytoplankton growth, primarily blue-green algae. When these algae die, they sink and are decomposed by bacteria that deplete the oxygen in the water, leading to fish kills and endangering species that cannot escape to healthier waters. The dead zone is eventually dispersed with the arrival of cooler weather and storms, which mix the water layers in the Gulf of Mexico (Miller & Spoolman 2016).
Strategies for Mitigating Nutrient Pollution
To effectively combat the impact of nonpoint source runoff in urban watersheds, we must focus on preserving existing nitrogen and phosphorus sinks such as wetlands or creating new ones, as well as controlling nutrient sources (Driscoll et al. 2003). This includes the simple yet crucial task of properly disposing of dog waste.
Municipal refuse collection is often the best option for dog waste, especially when it is picked up in plastic bags. Alternatively, composting is feasible if the waste is collected in biodegradable bags or directly from the garden. Since dog feces are high in nitrogen, they should be combined with carbon-rich materials like leaves to achieve an appropriate carbon-nitrogen ratio for effective composting.
Given that dog feces can harbor numerous harmful pathogens, including Escherichia coli, salmonella, and giardia, the composting process must reach temperatures above 50 degrees Celsius to mitigate these microorganisms. Even then, it is crucial to ensure that the compost does not come into contact with soil used for growing food crops. Additionally, the high salt content in dog waste can adversely affect soil health (Martínez-Sabater et al. 2019).
By taking responsibility for our dogs' waste and ensuring it does not enter urban watersheds, we can play a significant role in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus pollution and minimizing cultural eutrophication.
The first video, Nature Minute - The Environmental Dangers of Dog Poop, highlights the significant impact that dog waste has on the environment, detailing how it contributes to nutrient pollution and its broader consequences on ecosystems.
The second video, How to Dispose of Dog Poop the Green Way | One Small Step, provides practical advice on environmentally friendly methods for disposing of dog waste, emphasizing the importance of responsible pet ownership.
References:
Google Scholar
Campbell, B. M., Beare, D. J., Bennett, E. M., Hall-Spencer, J. M., Ingram, J. S., Jaramillo, F., … & Shindell, D. (2017). Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society, 22(4).
Driscoll, C. T., Whitall, D., Aber, J., Boyer, E., Castro, M., Cronan, C., … & Lawrence, G. (2003). Nitrogen pollution in the northeastern United States: sources, effects, and management options. BioScience, 53(4), 357–374.
Duan, S., Kaushal, S. S., Groffman, P. M., Band, L. E., & Belt, K. T. (2012). Phosphorus export across an urban to rural gradient in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 117(G1).
Dubrovsky, N. M., Burow, K. R., Clark, G. M., Gronberg, J. M., Hamilton, P. A., Hitt, K. J., … & Rupert, M. G. (2010). The quality of our Nation’s waters — Nutrients in the Nation’s streams and groundwater, 1992–2004. US geological survey Circular, 1350(2), 174.
Hobbie, S. E., Finlay, J. C., Janke, B. D., Nidzgorski, D. A., Millet, D. B., & Baker, L. A. (2017). Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), 4177–4182.
Martínez-Sabater, E., García-Muñoz, M., Bonete, P., Rodriguez, M., Sánchez-García, F. B., Pérez-Murcia, M. D., … & Moral, R. (2019). Comprehensive management of dog faeces: Composting versus anaerobic digestion. Journal of environmental management, 250, 109437.
Miller, G.T. and Spoolman, S.E. (2016). Living in the Environment, (19th Ed.) Canada: Cengage Learning.
Larger-than-average Gulf of Mexico ‘dead zone’ measured | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (noaa.gov).
Suprihatin, I., Fallowfield, H., Bentham, R., & Cromar, N. (2003). Determination of faecal pollutants in Torrens and Patawalonga catchment waters in South Australia using faecal sterols. Water science and technology, 47(7–8), 283–289.