Chapter 1: The State of the Internet

Have you ever pondered the notion that the internet might be on its last legs? Or that there exists a clandestine wire suspended high above New York City? If this comes as a surprise, it’s quite ironic—though not in the way you might think.

#1. Is the Internet Really Dying?

In a recent article, Isaiah McCall delves into what's being termed the “dead internet theory.” You might envision the internet as a vibrant space where individuals across the globe engage freely. After all, anyone can create a website, and we supposedly have the liberty to explore as we please. However, the reality is that most users gravitate towards a limited selection of platforms like Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. Many interactions on these sites may not even involve real people, as a significant number of accounts could be automated bots.

The situation is even more troubling. Major corporations control the most frequented websites and provide a heavily curated experience. Platforms such as Google, YouTube, and Facebook operate on an advertisement revenue model, which means they cater to their advertisers and impose numerous restrictions on content. While some of these limitations prevent the spread of harmful conspiracy theories, they also restrict valuable information.

Reflecting on the late 90s, my initial experiences on the internet felt liberating and uninhibited. It appeared less regulated by corporate interests compared to traditional media outlets like television. Yet, it seems that the internet has succumbed to corporate dominance, offering "free" services at the expense of our privacy and autonomy. We're constantly monitored, bombarded with ads, and the content we encounter is dictated by algorithms designed to keep us hooked. In essence, we are not truly free; we are merely components in a vast machine.

In this insightful video, "What Did Trevor Learn From The Daily Show? - Between The Scenes," Trevor Noah discusses the nuances of online interactions and the implications of our internet habits.

Chapter 2: Understanding Irony

#2. The Misunderstood Concept of Irony

Sean Kernan recently highlighted a common misunderstanding surrounding the term "irony." Often, people mistakenly label unfortunate situations as ironic. A notable example from the 90s is comedian Ed Byrne's critique of Alanis Morissette's song "Ironic," where none of the scenarios described actually fit the definition of irony.

“It’s like rain on your wedding day…isn’t it ironic?”

In reality, this scenario isn't ironic unless, of course, the wedding date was chosen by a meteorologist.

Furthermore, the term "paranoid" is frequently misapplied. It’s not simply about being overly worried; true paranoia involves an irrational belief that others are conspiring against you. Although it’s worth noting that just because you might feel paranoid doesn’t mean there’s no reason for concern—most people are generally indifferent to your existence.

In the video "What Makes Gen Z Humor So Interesting?" the discussion dives into the generational perceptions of irony and humor, shedding light on the evolving landscape of comedic interpretations.

Chapter 3: A Curious Tradition in New York City

#3. The Hidden Wire Above the City

Interestingly, a secret wire exists above New York City and several other American metropolises. This peculiar tradition stems from certain religious regulations that restrict activities on the Sabbath, including carrying items. To navigate this, a workaround was created, allowing individuals to carry objects within designated areas, defined by a boundary that could be a wall—or, intriguingly, a wire.

This practice strikes me as absurd. If such a rule can be adapted to accommodate carrying items, why not simply amend the rule to allow carrying on the Sabbath? While one can certainly maintain cultural heritage and traditions, it's perplexing to adhere to outdated regulations that seem devoid of reason. Why cling to archaic practices when progressive thinking could lead to a more rational existence?

The very concept of a deity that enforces such nonsensical rules raises questions. Why would a benevolent and omnipotent entity impose restrictions on activities essential for human life? If faced with a similar edict, I would likely reject it outright—albeit with a more measured approach in front of children.